Consolidation time for Yanukovych

0 comments

When former  President Yushchenko congratulated his 2004 foe as the legitimately elected president of Ukraine he also said that Yanukovych's first goal is to consolidate Ukraine. However,  President Yanukovych first move will not be state consolidation, but political consolidation. President Yanukovych already declared that a new coalition would be created soon. 
Він зазначив, що ця коаліція "буде збиратися під нового прем'єра, і вже з наступного тижня ми, швидше за все, вже побачимо цю фігуру.

He noted that the coalition "will be collected under a new prime minister, and already next week, we probably already see the shape. 
There is no sense in negotiating with Tymoshenko considering she won't recognize his election to the presidency   Lytvyn gave BYuT until 2 March to come up with coalition signatures proving that its still  viable. If that coalition comes apart, then Regions would presumably form a new coalition in the Rada.

Read On

Finally president

0 comments



 Yanukovych is president of Ukraine, photo from BBC Ukraine. The man denied the presidency five years ago now has his prize.Yushchenko apparently skipped the ceremony along with Tymoshenko. President Yanukovych first decree was to appoint an old Kuchma hand as head of the presidential secretariat,  Sergey Levochkin. 
Read On

Futile legal challenge by Tymoshenko is over

0 comments

The prime minister ended her legal challenge, after finally seeing the writing on the wall. The legal challenge was the last piece of political theater in the election. It was an action the prime minister had implied in her address last week that would not be successful. Today she confirms that the legal challenge had no chance of overturning the election. 

“There is no sense” in continuing the hearing, Timoshenko said in the statement. “The court has refused to find out the truth and I wanted to stop this performance that has nothing in common with justice.” The Kiev-based court agreed to accept Timoshenko’s retraction and will not consider the case, said the court’s spokeswoman Maria Shvynko, adding that the court rejects Timoshenko’s accusation. 
Now Tymoshenko can turn her attention to salvaging her coalition, something that may also turn out to be futile.

Read On

Court and Coalition

0 comments

 Tymoshenko's case is currently being heard in the Higher Administrative Court.  The court suspended the CEC election result, but Yanukovych can still take the oath of office. The notion that Yanukovych would keep Tymoshenko seems more far fetched now. Yanukovych would do better to get rid of her and install someone loyal (and dependent) on him.  

Regions will attempt to form a new coalition and avoid early elections. The speaker of the Rada has given the coalition 10 days to present documents proving that its still in existence. For this reason, Tymoshenko is attempting to keep her coalition intact. However, the vote on the election amendment revealed that the BYuT coalition does not have a working majority.  Regions thinks that failure to comply by March 2nd would mean that the BYuT led coalition is no longer in existence. In other words, a Regions led coalition could be formed.  This could also lead to another legal challenge, this time on the dismissal of the coalition.

Read On

Assorted links

0 comments


  • A look at the Obama's administration stance on Ukraine. [RA]
  • How Yushchenko helped Yanukovych win the presidency. [Taras Kuzio]
  • Yanukovych won't keep Tymoshenko as prime minister. [For-UA]
  • Shakhtar players denied access to Harrod's. [The Guardian]

Read On

Economy contracts 15% in 2009

0 comments

The economy contracted by 15% in 2009 its worse performance since 1994 according to BusinesWeek. The IMF had forecast a 14% contraction in GDP. Reuters' article on the economic news offers one reason for the sharp contraction by Ukraine last year. 
Analysts have long said reliance on steel -- a legacy from the Soviet days -- dictates the fate of the economy and until structural reforms are introduced, the country will continue to swing with the price of metals.
"Steel is a particularly bad commodity from the credit perspective because every time there's a credit crunch, people stop buying cars and houses," said Commerzbank analyst Dmitry Sentchoukov.
Few believe President elect Viktor Yanukovich, backed by wealthy industrialist and steelmen from the eastern regions, would usher in a period of such fundamental reforms.
The last bit (emphasis mine)  might be true, but it depends on how the economy recovers this year and how much the oligarchs push for increase economic integration with the EU.  In Revolution in Orange ("The Ancien Regime", pg. 13) Anders Aslund argued that the impetus for economic reform was  that "creditworthiness [of Ukraine] had to be restored." In this case, Regions could embrace major reforms, if the economic remains dire. 

Read On

Yanukovych's WSJ article

0 comments

Yanukovych's WSJ article contained the kind of empty language expected by a politician trying to shake off his image as the Orange villain and appear more like statesman. 
Let me say here, a Yanukovych presidency is committed to the integration of European values in Ukraine. Ukraine should make use of its geopolitical advantages and become a bridge between Russia and the West. 
Statements like the excerpt above mean nothing, European values in Ukraine-- lofty and vague.  Or making a bridge between Russia and the anthropomorphic West, perhaps he refers to a gas bridge?  It was a completely bland piece of work designed to reassure skeptics about his intentions as president. 
Read On

Those are fighting words

0 comments

Some excerpts via Ukrainska Pravda and BBC Ukraine of Tymoshenko's address to the public and my comments. She accuses her opponents of massive falsification, flying in the face of international observers who called the vote clean. Not what I'd expected, I thought she was going to concede, but not resign. Instead she's going with the legal challenge. 
Янукович - не наш Президент. І як би не розгорталися далі обставини, він ніколи не стане легітимно обраним Президентом України
--"Not our president" and not the legitimately elected president, that puts to rest what she she thinks on the election.

Прем’єр заявила, що «понад мільйон голосів» було сфальсифіковано по всій Україні.
--She claims under a million voters were falsified, has evidence, but why didn't any of the observers see fraud? 
І саме тому ми будемо діяти тільки в правовий спосіб і тільки у суді.
--Drawing a line and declaring that she'll focus only on legal means.
Я дуже добре знаю, так як і ви, якість роботи наших судів. Але в той же час моя відповідальність перед вами, перед країною зобов'язує мене боротися за відновлення справедливості. Не піти сьогодні до суду означає здати Україну криміналітету без бою.
--Already implying that the courts will not deliver a fair verdict, but she has a responsibility to act. 

Read On

Tymoshenko's choice

0 comments

Tymoshenko is pursuing a legal challenge of the results. Her number two has said that the government will not voluntarily resign. While BYuT continues to attack the validity of the election, Regions claims that the courts have rejected BYuT's complaints

This situation has shades of the 2007 Ukrainian political crisis when Rada factions (Regions coalition)  refused to recognize the president's decree dissolving the Rada. Political agreement resolved the dispute, not the courts. 

Read On

Assorted links

0 comments


  • So Yanukovych received an uninspiring 48% of the vote. [Interfax-UA]
  • Best Western hotel chain in Ukraine. [via Marketwatch]
  •  Tymoshenko may go into opposition or try to remain in power. [BusinessWeek]
  • FT article reminding us of  Yanukovych's ambiguous commitment to economic reform. [FT]

Read On

International recognition for Yanukovych win

0 comments

Unlike the 2004 presidential election, this time Yanukovych has been recognized as the winner by the U.S., Germany, among other states. Yanukovych wants Tymoshenko to resign, but I think he should be urging her to give up her legal challenge.
Read On

BYuT challenging the results

0 comments

Tymoshenko has not conceded, but there is a  possibility that she may go into opposition. While her first reaction to the loss was to reject the outcome, she's now realizing that there is no major international support for her position

I go back to the Motyl article in the Moscow Times, who analyzed Ukraine's election through the rubric of Samuel Huntington. 
If Yanukovych wins, he will control the presidency and the Constitutional Court, but Tymoshenko will, in all likelihood, remain the prime minister. Their power struggle will likely continue — at least until parliamentary elections give one or the other an advantage in the parliament. But their incentives to cooperate over policy will also be greater than at present. 
 Yanukovych could accept Tymoshenko as prime minister out of political necessity. However, unlike Yushchenko, Yanukovych has a party of power in the Rada that may already have enough votes to form a working coalition. He also has major economic problems that need to be addressed, which may force him to put up with Tymoshenko as prime minister for a short time. Tymoshenko would pass the needed reforms, than be dismissed. 
Read On

Comment on the election observation for second round

0 comments

It is very difficult to determine the extent to which the U.S. election observation missions and those from other Western countries actually deterred fraud in different elections. The answer to that question lies with persons who might have been planning to commit fraud, and they are obviously unlikely to volunteer such information. 
From Thomas Carothers' book Assessing Democracy Assistance (pg. 47, no direct link). So one can see why I'm skeptical when election observers claim that this was "an impressive display of democratic elections", as posted in For-UA. 
Read On

Election Outcome: Looking at the news coverage

0 comments


Plenty of news coverage on the election outcome, no surprise considering that the "villain" from the 2004 election won this time. Naturally, there is a need to re-evaluate Yanukovych now that he has won the presidential election. Adrian Karatnycky writes in the WSJ with this in mind. His line of thought follows that of Alexander Motyl that Yanukovych's win could lead to a more coherent political situation in Ukraine.  That's possible, but haven't we learned from the post-Orange victory predictions that we are terrible at making predictions.The Economist makes a sound conclusion concerning this election.
In any event, this election was not about geopolitics but about Ukraine’s own governance and economy. The choice of Mr Yanukovich as president would be neither a disaster nor a breakthrough for Ukraine’s oligarchic political system. He would inherit a country with weak institutions, a struggling economy and a disillusioned population. He may not be able to deal with those. But at this stage it is less important than having a clear winner.
 Alas, both Karatnycky and FT write as if Yanukovych were in the political wilderness for five years, skipping over his year long term as prime minister from 2006-2007. The FT calls his election victory "an extraordinary comeback", but wasn't his return as prime minister in 2006 more impressive considering that the man he beat appointed him? The 2006 elections also illustrated the political power of Regions, while also indicating that the public was still willing to vote for the "villain's" party. It showed that Regions could take advantage of the divided "Orange" team, as it did in this election.  

Meanwhile, LA Times writes about the pressure on Tymoshenko to concede defeat and not dispute the results of the election. However I don't agree that this election was based on a West-East divide that the NY Times blog sees in Ukraine. While the Times blog post is right that the old Hapsburg portion of Ukraine sided with Tymoshenko, taking a look at the map above (via Ukrainska Pravda) one can see she won more than just that region. She took central Ukraine and oblasts east of Kyiv, which were not part of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth or the Austro-Hungarian Empire.  Its no surprise that Yanukovych took Donbas and the rest of eastern Ukraine, its the political stronghold of the party, not because of some historical border. 

Read On

Yanukovych ahead in count

0 comments

 

  
Well,Yanukovych seems to be on his way to victory in the second round of the presidential election, above polls come from Pravda. The count isn't finished so Tymoshenko isn't finished. A high number of "against all" votes according to the exit polls. In all polls that number would effectively give Tymoshenko the lead (or Yanukovych) or do nothing if evenly distributed between the two, but I wonder how genuine those protests voters are?
Read On

Assorted links

0 comments


  •  Q&A to the Ukrainian election. [BBC]
  • Final rally before the second round of the election. [Ukrainiana]
  • One explanation why the national exit poll was off in the first round. [WaPo]

Read On

Presidential Election: Second Round

0 comments

Many commentators predict a narrow victory by opposition leader Yanukovich, but fiery Prime Minister Tymoshenko is threatening to summon protesters in a replay of the 2004 "Orange Revolution" if she deems the second-round election unfair.
From Reuters, it seems that the conventional view on the second round of the presidential election is that Yanukovych is still the favorite to win. As to the idea that there will be mass protests like in 2004, that seems unlikely. While Yushchenko in 2004 could be credited with reforming the economy (leading to economic growth),  Tymoshenko has led Ukraine during a difficult economic contraction where she spent almost the entire past year feuding with the president. 

Two articles in Bloomberg and FT's Lex column note that the big worry from the election tomorrow is that the political paralysis will remain.  As the Bloomberg story notes a Yanukovych presidency could lead to further delays in implementing economic reforms, if Yanukovych calls early Rada elections.  However, this past week's events showed BYuT lacks a working majority in the Rada.  The Lex column has it right that political stability is needed after the election, regardless of the winner.
 It is arguably less important which candidate wins Sunday’s second round than that the poll produces a clean result without lengthy protests, enabling political stability to be quickly achieved. With an economy still tottering after shrinking 15 per cent last year, Ukraine must urgently get a stalled $16bn International Monetary Fund bail-out programme back on track.

Read On

Yanukovych gets his way with the law

0 comments

The law on the election of the Ukrainian president does not foresee situations in which commission members representing one of the candidates are absent at the appointed time for the opening of polling stations or the vote count. In such situations, district election commissions are banned from opening polling stations or from starting to count the vote due to the absence of a quorum. The law passed by the Verkhovna Rada on February 3 foresees such a situation and ensures a mechanism for a guaranteed quorum when people are to vote, [and for when] election commissions are to sum up the result of the election," reads the statement.
Party of Regions statement on the amended laws on election, which Yushchenko signed into law. Its nonsense.  The changes in the election law were designed to ease Yanukovych's victory, rather than to prevent election fraud. This is the same party that tried to relax the rules on  home voting prior to the first round of the presidential election. This is the same Yanukovych who recently expressed his disdain for democracy. I'm not surprised that Yushchenko signed it, considering his rants against Tymoshenko he clearly sees Yanukovych as the lesser evil. 

Read On

Assorted links

0 comments


  • One survey gives its verdict on the second round. [RIA Novosti]
  • Tihipko profile by Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty. [RFE/RL]
  • FSB admits to espionage incident. [For-UA]
  • Both presidential candidates support EU trade agreement. [Bloomberg]

Read On

Does Yanukovych's no-show debate mean anything?

0 comments

"The important thing is that this empty spot will not become Ukrainian president," said Tymoshenko during the 100-minute debate-turned-monologue. "And although he is absent, I can sense a smell in this studio. This is the smell of fear. I don't want a banal coward to become the next leader of our nation." 
From an RFE/RL piece about Yanukovych not showing up for his debate with Tymoshenko. Yanukovych shrugged off his no show at the presidential debate.  I suppose it doesn't matter as Yanukovych is more interested in using his unofficial coalition in the Rada to influence the outcome of the second round of the presidential election.

Read On

The Rada as the election battlefield

0 comments


Yanukovich's Regions Party earlier pushed through parliament an amendment to electoral rules that will scrap the requirement for a quorum of representatives of both contenders to approve the count at individual polling stations.
The interlude before the second round of the presidential election  has been more interesting than I expected. Regions has used its unofficial majority in the Rada to pass new amendments to the law on the presidential election. This comes after Regions dismissed Lutsenko, which led BYuT to re-appoint him acting interior minister. According to a BBC Ukraine article these amendments could apply to the second round of this presidential election.  I suppose the Yushchenko-is-working-for-Yanukovych meme may be validated, if the president decides to sign the legislation.

Read On